patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Shelby Township Board of Trustees Votes Pro-Life With Adoption of Resolution

The Shelby Township Board of Trustees have made a controversial move with the adoption of a resolution that states the township is in favor of fewer elective abortions.

 

The Shelby Township Board of Trustees adpoted a resolution Tuesday night in support of commemerating October as Respect Life Month in Macomb County.

Respect Life Month is a national Catholic initiative that targets abortion.

The unanamious Shelby Township vote was made after the Macomb County Board of Commissioners adopted the same proclamation in August. Much of Shelby's resolution was taken directly from the county's proclamation.

"It's a function of government to seek a reduction in the number of elective abortions that occur within the county of Macomb," states Shelby's resolution.

Shelby Township resident John Holeton told the Board before it voted that he was against having the local government take a stance on abortion.

"We have to protect everyone’s rights of the constitution and separation of church and state is one of them," he said.

The resolution does not carry legal weight, but it does reflect the official position of the township. 

"Christians can honor God and change laws, we can support mothers and save the lives of babies, and we can do that by supporting pro-life," said Shelby Township Supervisor Rick Stathakis.

Other residents came to the podium and applauded Shelby Township's efforts to promote anti-abortion.

A copy of the resolution is available for viewing at the Shelby Township Clerk's Office.

    • Do you think the Shelby Township Board of Trustees should take a stance on abortion?

      (Voting has been closed for this question)
      • Yes.
          6 (23%)
      • No.
          20 (76%)
      • I am not sure.
          0 (0%)
      Total votes: 26
    • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
    Related Topics: Politics, Shelby Township Board of Trustees, abortion, and pro-life

    Laurie Kieliszewski

    9:24 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

    I am glad to see the conversation happening. I am pro-life with exception. Only my exception doesn't include using abortion as a form of birth control. We all know how to prevent pregnancy. Teach your children and they won't have to be faced with this awful option and live with the consequences of either choice the rest of their lives.

    Reply

    David Weaver

    1:43 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

    I am Pro-Life too but not sure if the Township or County should be adopting these resolutions.

    Reply

    macombresident

    1:43 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

    Unbelievable! Surely the Shelby Board has more pressing issues to attend to at the moment: the 41A Court Issue, the Police & Fire Pension Deficit , current health costs for township employees, declining tax revenues, planning & zoning issues, our roads, sidewalks, libraries, parks, senior housing....the list goes on & on.
    Certainly any of those issues deserves the board's attention & focus over such a contentious, politically charged "proclamation" that has no legal standing or effect.

    Politicians are entitled to their opinion, may campaign on it to attract voters, but once they are in office they represent ALL the people, not just those with certain beliefs. A non-secular prayer before a township meeting was ok, pushing the boundaries with regard to separation of church & state, but ok, but this is just over the top.

    Reply

    Dana Horton

    2:37 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

    Too late for this decision. Too many of the members of the township board were born anyway.

    Reply

    Jill Damron

    6:20 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

    How can it be bad to support anything that would encourage respect for life? Nothing is more important an issue then to resepect life from conception till natural death. We are not pagans yet.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    SharonP

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    Jill-- please explain your definition of "pagan".

    Comment_arrow

    Jill Damron

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    Pagan" equated with a Christianized sense of the word.. to signify a person who is sensual, materialistic, self-indulgent, unconcerned with the future and uninterested in religion. Such as pagan worship, human sacrifce. I don't know for sure..but cultures/religions of the past may have started out with good intentions, and over time ended up pretty sick. We have to look at past lessons on how human life was valued and take a lesson. It may not totally happen in our generation, but it starts the down hill slide when families fall apart, and human life is not respected from conception. If we can respect an animal before birth, than how can we not respect a human before birth. I don't want to get into an arguement with anyone. I just think it needs saying and I am not afraid or ashamed to say the being prolife is the right thing. There is no arguement that will stand against it.

    Comment_arrow

    SharonP

    10:00 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

    Jill-- should the government ban all birth control, too? Is that what your God says we should do?

    No moral code written on a rock 2,000 years ago should diminish American liberty.

    Sharon

    6:20 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

    All for this! Thank you, Shelby board. Don't listen to any of those negative comments that may come your way. You did the right thing!

    Reply

    Jim

    6:20 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012

    Is it possible that it was Obamacare, that is mandating employers to provide abortafacients to their employees unless they have a religious exception, that triggered this? It is having a lot of employers who have christian principles give them pause. There is nothing in the Constitution that states that there is, or should be a "seperation of Church and State". It says that we will not promote, nor hinder the establishment thereof (paraphrasing). It was only loosely derived from a letter written to a foriegn dignitary, much later, that inferred this.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    SharonP

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    Seriously, Jim? Are you saying the concept of separation of Church and State was conjured out of thin air by liberals hoping to secure religious freedom for all?

    Comment_arrow

    Jill Damron

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    Separation of Church and State - The Metaphor and the Constitution
    "Separation of church and state" is a common metaphor that is well recognized. Equally well recognized is the metaphorical meaning of the church staying out of the state's business and the state staying out of the church's business. Because of the very common usage of the "separation of church and state phrase," most people incorrectly think the phrase is in the constitution. The phrase "wall of separation between the church and the state" was originally coined by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to the Danbury Baptists on January 1, 1802. His purpose in this letter was to assuage the fears of the Danbury, Connecticut Baptists, and so he told them that this wall had been erected to protect them. The metaphor was used exclusively to keep the state out of the church's business, not to keep the church out of the state's business.

    Barbara Kiel

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    While I support this stance, and consider myself prolife, I am puzzled elected officials feel it is their 'job' to make this statement which has NO LEGAL FORCE whatsoever. Seems to be more like a useless waste of time considering there is nothing they can do to make the Twp. residents follow any laws other than the state/federal ones in place regarding abortion. And does anyone truly think their opinion will impact those who may choose abortion? .As a previous poster said..surely there are some huge issues facing them that DOES require their full attention. Frankly this just seems like they are pandering for pro-life voters in an election year.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Nancy Smith

    10:31 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    I feel the same way that you do, Barbara. Thank you for stating it so clearly.

    SharonP

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    Dear Republicans,
    Why are you NOT allowing future Democrats to be aborted?

    Incredibly stupid strategy. Let's bankrupt the country by forcing poor stupid people into having unwanted kids until the 47% is 97%...

    By today's standards, Jesus Christ had a dead beat father.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Jill Damron

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    Sharon P, I don't want anyone aborted, dems or republicans. Every time I read a mean spirited comment on any web site, it has always been a democrat. Why is that? Why are you so mad at everything? Maybe if you had Jesus in your heart you wouldn't be so angry. I am sorry for you

    SharonP

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    Does Rick Stathakis know the first thing about the history of abortion in this country? Apparently not.

    Yes, Rick, "Christians can honor God"--but can they honor a God you don't approve of?

    But No, Rick. Abortion laws can not be altered if such alteration would infringe our fundamental rights. Do you know what those are and how they work? Do you? Do you understand the right to privacy and how that plays into a woman's right to do what is best for her person?

    Stop legislating morals. Leave your opinions in your home and stick to the constitution.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Jill Damron

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    The baby is a seperate human being from it's mother. it has its own heart and lungs. it is not up to us to decide if that baby lives or not. i have been thru this in my own life. i no what i am talking about. you will see someday... we all will. aren't you glad your mom didn't abort you?
    the constitution ~ have you read it? read it. i have... and have taken classes as well.

    SharonP

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    "You are Free to do as you're told!

    You are free to do as you're told!"

    Reply

    Joy

    10:26 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

    Proud to be part of the township and county! Way to go Shelby!

    Reply

    RantnRage

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    Gotta wonder how the Townie Board will respond when "Pro-Choice Month" comes up. They should be expected to pass a similar resoluton.

    Even John F. Kennedy, the first Catholic P residenof the USAt, knew enough to keep religion out of politics and NOT to be known as the "Pope's President"

    Reply

    Katy J

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    I just don't understand what made the board adopt something so fundamentally Catholic? I understand that there is a huge number of Shelby citizens who are Christian and no one likes the idea of abortion, but to adopt something that is so religiously based seems extremely bias against Shelby citizens who aren't Christians. I personally hate this topic and it seems to me that the board is trying to create more dissention amongst citizens by even addressing this! If they want to do it in their separate political campaigns, fine... but as a whole? This is such a polarizing subject matter and really has no place in the township right now, especially when we all seem so divided as it is. I'm just not sure what they were thinking, or what they were trying to achieve by doing this?

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Jill Damron

    1:11 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    sad to have to even say this.. but shouldn't it be fundamentaly HUMAN, to respect human life? why should it matter who put it out there? i am not catholic by any stretch but what a shame that it would bother anyone to respect human life. examine yourself and why that would bother anyone, politics aside? why

    Comment_arrow

    Katy J

    12:44 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012

    This is presented as a Catholic initiative, that's why it matters. They didn't adopt it stating that every Shelby citizen should respect human life, they adopted it because the Catholic church is making October Right to Life month and specifically against abortion. I agree that all humans should respect life, but if that's the case, why do we even need a resolution? Your argument goes both ways... If it should be fundamentally human, then we don't need our Township board telling us this is the way we should be... I have "examined myself" and I choose not to judge other people and choices they may make (regardless of it its a decision I would make). I don't live their lives and I don't have to suffer their consequences... And again, by adopting a Catholic initiative (as stated in this story), you alienate religions other than Catholicism... regardless of if the issue spreads through multiple religions.

    Thomas Delise

    10:32 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    With all the adultry that goes on,including board members ( I heard through the grapevine ) maybe thiis board should adopt a resolution on less adultry and start with themselves as being an example!

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    David Weaver

    4:18 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    Come on Thomas, do you need to bring an unsubstantiated rumor to this topic? Low blow an un-warranted.

    Comment_arrow

    SharonP

    10:00 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

    To the King go the spoils!

    Jill Damron

    1:11 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    shouldn't respecting life be a normal human response? i am not catholic, but who cares who would put that out there.. i would say yes. what is wrong with ppl that they would be upset about respecting life. what does adultry or anything else someone would want to charge board members with (was that a fact based accusation or just something to be said to start a rumor) have to do with respecting life? there is something fundamentally wrong if humans refuse to respect human life. there is not an arguement that will stand to support taking an innocent human life, before birth or an ill person at any age who can't speak for themselves. if you want to keep gov out then roll back roe vs wade, why did the gov get involved in this in the first place??

    Reply

    Nancy Smith

    4:18 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

    The fundamental question is: "What are the roles/responsibilities of the elected Shelby Township Board of Trustees?"

    Read the information on this link: http://www.shelbytwp.org/board_of_trustees.jsp

    Personally, I concur with their views on pro-life, but they clearly over stepped the roles for the positions.

    * Note partial information provided on the Shelby Township website.

    There are specific statutory responsibilities for each office.
    The Supervisor oversees the day-to-day operation of the Township, including the Police and Fire Departments, except for those areas whose responsibility falls to the Clerk or Treasurer.

    The Trustees are fiduciaries who vote on issues before the Board. The Board as a whole makes the important decisions for the Township, including things like hiring staff, large purchases, new buildings, and so on. The Board sets the budget to establish the spending for the following year.

    Reply

    Matt Guarnieri

    12:44 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012

    This is strictly a "resolution", not costing or binding to taxpayers in any way.
    The fact that so many people worry and comment about this topic as opposed to the ethics of a "soon to be trustee", the "operations manager", of a previous Township vendor who is accused of over-billing hundreds of citizens without remorse and is suing Shelby Township taxpayers whom he will soon swear to represent baffles me.
    I agree, this subject doesn't belong on the Township agenda but if it was brought up I would have to vote "yeah" also.
    But how does the way I feel about life affect taxpayers locally?

    Reply

    Bill Peters

    2:15 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

    What do all these people have in common Kowal, Curtis, Berz, Freeman, Batchelder, Nightingale, Manzella and Leman-They are all friends on David Erickson facebook page-A vote for Erickson is a vote for all the above

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    SharonP

    10:00 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

    It's amazing anyone still votes Republican in these parts. Ideal Republican candidates live in Bloomfield and Birmingham. Why? Because they are rich. No one around here is doing well enough to benefit from Romney and company.

    Satori

    10:00 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

    I would like the board to also pass a "resolution" condeming pedaphile priests, ministers and others who are calling themselves Christians. Let's pass a "resolution"
    condeming the murder of thousands of innocent men, women,and children in foreign countries in the name of "Freedom". Are their lives less Sacred and valued than American lives ??? Or are they just "Military Collateral Damage"??? Does the Commandment "THOU SHALL NOT KILL" apply ony some of the time? . Go down to some of the Homeless Shelters or Battered Womens Shelters and see how we "SUPPORT" these women and children. RESOLUTIONS AND TALK ARE CHEAP.

    Reply

    David Weaver

    12:24 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

    I find it incredible how much response and attention this non-binding resolution has garnered. Some of the responses have gone beyond the scope of the resolution but I like the honest, open discussion and that most has been respectful.

    Reply

    Leave a comment