patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Legacy Costs

Friday, March 8, 2013

Shelby Awaits Macomb Vote on Cost-Splitting Agreement Key to Court Relocation

Shelby Township approved an interlocal agreement this week that negotiates how an estimated $8 million in unfunded legacy costs would be divided should the 41A District Court relocate to Macomb Township.

Shelby Township officials may have given their blessing this week for the 41A District Court's relocation to Macomb, but court personnel shouldn't start packing up their offices just yet. While the board's 6-1 vote Tuesday to approve an interlocal agreement between Shelby Township and Macomb Township provides a step forward in the relocation process, it is far from a deed to the new property. Macomb Township’s board of trustees must still approve the agreement and ultimately, court administrators will decide where the court sets up shop. “We have had our input through attorneys to shape the interlocal agreement and (Shelby) has passed an agreement that we will probably be able to live with,” said Macomb Clerk Mike Koehs. With copies of the…

Dana Horton

1:09 pm on Tuesday, April 9, 2013

I just heard that Mr Stathakis placed a call to 911 from the old police station during the relay for life. What he didn’t realize was that he was on video surveillance and the 911 operator could see him actually talking on the pay phone. When the 911 operator asked if this was the supervisor on the phone he hung up. Can Mr Stathakis act any stranger? What a creeper.   more ›

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Shelby to Vote in March on Cost-Splitting Agreement Key to Court Relocation

The Shelby Township board is scheduled to vote March 5 on an agreement with Macomb Township that proposes a division of long-term costs should the 41A District Court relocate.

March 5 may be a turning point in the future of the 41A District Court as the Shelby Township board of trustees votes to approve or reject an agreement to divide long-term costs with Macomb Township should the court relocate. The interlocal agreement was reportedly reached in January after more than three years of back-and-forth talks between Shelby Township, the current host of the court, and Macomb Township, which has expressed interest in building a new court provided certain personnel matters could be resolved. One of the chief barriers to relocation talks has been the division of long-term costs associated with the court, specifically retiree health care and pensions. As the court's host community is financially responsible for legacy…

Matt Guarnieri

11:44 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

It seems people are finally getting used to the idea of the court moving out of Shelby Twp. for good..... hope I can make it to the send off party. Not sure why no one else suggest the combining of the two 41-A district courts into one building, it's the only district court split into two buildings in Michigan... why is that?   more ›

Thursday, January 24, 2013

New Cost-Splitting Agreement Could Bring Court Relocation Talks Back to Shelby

A new agreement between Shelby and Macomb townships proposes splitting long-term costs should the 41A District Court relocate.

One of the chief barriers to relocation talks concerning the 41A District Court was reportedly overcome this week, meaning the court may move out of Shelby Township yet. Representatives of Shelby and Macomb townships told The Macomb Daily that an agreement has been reached for the division of long-term costs associated with the court, specifically retiree health care and pensions. These legacy costs have proved a major sticking point in relocation talks between the two communities, as Shelby Township’s liability for the costs has been estimated at $8 milllion. As the court's host community is financially responsible for legacy costs, Macomb Township has been hesitant to welcome the institution with its multimillion-dollar burden. While …

Got a Hot Tip?